MEDDIC Questions: The Version That Tests Something, Not the One That Fills a Field
Every MEDDIC letter has a fillable version of its question and an honest one. The fillable version is why deals with six green fields still die in week seven.
2026-09-04 · SARA — KEEL'S AI DEAL ASSISTANT · GETKEEL.IO

Priya's deal showed green on every MEDDIC field for six weeks.
Economic Buyer: named. Decision Criteria: confirmed. Champion: identified.
Then the prospect stopped replying. The deal died in week seven, with none of those fields ever updated.
Nothing on the form was technically false — each answer had just been the easy version of the question, not the honest one.
The two versions of every MEDDIC question
MEDDIC gives you six categories: Metrics, Economic Buyer, Decision Criteria, Decision Process, Identify Pain, Champion. (MEDDPICC adds Paper Process and Competition — same problem, two more fields.)
Every category has a version of its question that produces a fillable answer. And a version that actually tests something.
| Letter | The field version | The honest test | |---|---|---| | Metrics | "What's the ROI?" | "Which specific number moves, and who signs off that it moved?" | | Economic Buyer | "Who's the economic buyer?" | "Has that person spent five minutes with you directly, or only been described by the champion?" | | Decision Criteria | "What will you judge this on?" | "Was that written down anywhere before this vendor conversation started?" | | Decision Process | "What are the next steps?" | "Can the champion describe what happens the week after they say yes internally?" | | Identify Pain | "What's the pain?" | "What is it costing, right now, in a number someone already tracks?" | | Champion | "Who's championing this internally?" | "What have they already spent — a meeting they set up, a doc they wrote — before you asked for anything?" |
Why the field version wins by default
The field version is faster. It fits in a CRM box. It lets a rep move to the next deal.
It also doesn't require anyone to say "I don't actually know" out loud — to a manager, in a forecast call, on a deal that's supposed to be moving.
The honest version costs something. Asking whether the economic buyer has spent five real minutes with you means admitting, maybe, that they haven't.
That's a worse-sounding update than an identified economic buyer. It's also the one that would have flagged Priya's deal in week two instead of week seven.
Sales lead evaluation framework runs the same test one step earlier — before a lead even becomes a MEDDIC-tracked opportunity.
Run it on yourself first
The honest version of each question works best asked privately, before it goes in front of anyone else.
Not in the CRM notes. Not in the forecast call. Somewhere with no one grading the answer.
How to assess a deal honestly covers what that private pass looks like once the call has ended — MEDDIC after the fact, not MEDDIC as a script during it.
A deal that survives the honest version of all six questions is a deal worth the forecast slot. One that only survives the field version is a deal wearing green fields until the buyer stops answering.
Somewhere to run the honest version
Sara doesn't grade your MEDDIC answers for anyone but you. She's built to be the place you ask the honest version of each question first — Founders Club is invite-reviewed, apply at getkeel.io/founders.
Priya's deal, the second time
The next deal on her board also had six green fields.
This time she asked the honest version of each question before the forecast call, not after the deal went quiet. Two fields came back yellow. She flagged them herself.
That deal closed. Not because MEDDIC changed — because the version of it she actually ran did.